After a short Christmas break, testing resumed on the casing 2.0 design
Main iterations for this test are:
- Better Fitting Nozzle Washer
- Better Glue Application And Tolerances
- Better Cast Fuel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b6b5/9b6b55b2636f7ae9d1f4ffa8d26f754b6f4d0aff" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26a71/26a717e3e0c80883a4fdb7f9409ba40821c24400" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bb96/0bb969f60dec12af100847804a2d1f75b5e3ac6e" alt=""
These changes allowed R-7 to survive the burn with the nozzle in place, but moved the failure point to the side of the casing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18675/186750a806ee6c66e0659fc014e5053727d93c45" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7919/d7919ad11ef44f670c1794de11a156aa8cdb727f" alt=""
Test Date: 28/12/2020 | |
Pre-Test Weight: 38.74g (With igniter) | |
Post-Test Weight: 20.21 | |
Peak Thrust: 718 g | |
Burn Time: 2 Seconds |
As you can see there was a minor structural failure on the casing, resulting from pressurized flames under the nozzle finding a different path trough the 2 layers of PVC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce815/ce815bf3f4f44fb601598c4af0d1b8587b0a8564" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bea7/4bea781780d7607a1b086aeea8c0d65cf28978ca" alt=""
A solution for this might be a different case material, not design
Possible materials include: Fire Retardant Cardboard or Aluminum (Aluminium)
Further Research Is Needed
(The naming scheme of the rockets has also been changed from R* to R-*, I did this by accident but I think its quite cool so I’m keeping it)
I have also acquired a 3D printer (A Creality Ender 3 V2 to be precise), and have been experimenting with 3D CAD Design
Notice the grey ring around the rocket on the STTS, this is a custom designed and printed part that makes sure the rocket does not wobble during testing
(The small holes are for venting potential casing leakage and are intentional)
I intend to make much if not all of the main rocket body from this
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9499/f9499efba901468d6aa6dd60c16c8a0bb28bcc65" alt=""
Stress Testing shows it can handle a lot of physical impact force
It is great to be able to design and develop a part in half an hour instead of days
I also got a old phone from a relative (Many thanks), and have repurposed it into a wrist mounted PDA of sorts, using a 3d printed brace
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eea67/eea67b39251eef0c9b28516ac6c9067089b083c3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad506/ad50605fc7d8a5c349a11c7914ad16086b031c4e" alt=""
I am using this as a pre launch / test checklist and it helps tremendously with organization and efficiency
It still needs some work with the mounting system, but that can be ironed out
I am also hereby setting a goal:
If / When I manage to make 5 Rocket Motors that behave in much the same way (Thrust profile, max power, burn time) and produce a minimal thrust of 500 g, I will focus my efforts on launching 1 up in a (probably 3d printed) rocket
I hope to achieve this early to mid 2021 (I was oh so optimistic back then)
As always, the raw data (In a 7-Zip archive):
I also recommend Notepad++ for viewing and editing
4 thoughts on “R-7 Test Results”